Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Sugar Pine Mine controversy update

According to Reuters, some southwest Oregon miners are calling for peaceful protests at local Bureau of Land Management offices in Oregon on Thursday, April 23rd. The protests are over the notice of non-compliance that BLM issued to the owners of the Sugar Pine Mine. Unfortunately Reuter's didn't follow the Medford Mail Tribune's lead in pointing out that the Sugar Pine mining claim is on public land belonging to all Americans.

The Sugar Pine Mine is located on lands managed by the BLM on Galice Creek, a tributary of the world famous Wild and Scenic Rogue River.

After BLM's  decade long struggle to bring the operators of the Leopold Mine on Galice Creek into compliance with regulations, this is what part of the mine site looked like.
According to Reuters:
"The miners argue they have exclusive surface rights and do not have to follow federal regulations."
The miners are wrong. Read about the BLM's authority to regulate the mining and occupancy of federal mining claims on public lands herehere and here.

Previously, one of the co-owners of the Sugar Pine mining claim was on local TV calling the BLM's actions a "land grab." He compared it to telling someone they had to leave their home.

However, since the federal government has title to the surface of the land that the Sugar Pine Mine is located on—and has authority to regulate activities on it—his accusation of land grab has no foundation in law. Read about who holds the title to federal lands where mining claims are located here.

While calling for peaceful protests, the miners are is still using inflammatory rhetoric on their websites and the Reuters' article quotes a BLM spokesperson as saying while they've dealt with numerous non-compliance issues in past they've never seen a response at this scale. He added that:
"There are folks who are armed in the area and we've asked our employees to stay out of the area around the mine, just to be on the safe side,"
Read previous posts on the Sugar Pine Mine controversy:
For the full Reuters article: